Discussion:
OE-QuoteFix
(too old to reply)
Hieroglyph Lumphammer
2011-08-03 19:17:51 UTC
Permalink
How do I get OE-QuoteFix to start Outlook Express in the /outnews mode? It's
too much of a pita to use OE for mail, what with Live Mail installed, but
Live Mail as a newsreader is a pos. Like Windows 98.

HL
Tim Meddick
2011-08-03 20:55:05 UTC
Permalink
You have Live Mail installed on a Windows Millennium PC ??!

Also, I'm not sure what you want OE for, but if it's just as a
newsreader..... simply don't include any Mail accounts and just create
your News Account[s] and checkmark against the box[es] in each news account
named "Include this account when checking for new messages".

==

Cheers, Tim Meddick, Peckham, London. :-)
Post by Hieroglyph Lumphammer
How do I get OE-QuoteFix to start Outlook Express in the /outnews mode?
It's too much of a pita to use OE for mail, what with Live Mail
installed, but Live Mail as a newsreader is a pos. Like Windows 98.
HL
98 Guy
2011-08-05 04:38:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by Hieroglyph Lumphammer
How do I get OE-QuoteFix to start Outlook Express in the /outnews
mode? It's too much of a pita to use OE for mail, what with Live
Mail installed, but Live Mail as a newsreader is a pos.
I use Netscape Communicator 4.79 for reading news.

It can be downloaded from here:

http://downloads.5star-network.com/Internet/cc32d478.exe

Here's what the user-interface looks like:

Loading Image...

Very fast and efficient and organized way to read and post to usenet. I
dare anyone to show me something better.
Post by Hieroglyph Lumphammer
Like Windows 98.
Yes, I like Win-98 as well.

Much better than that POS Win-me. What an abortion that was.
N. Miller
2011-08-05 15:02:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by 98 Guy
I use Netscape Communicator 4.79 for reading news.
...
Post by 98 Guy
Very fast and efficient and organized way to read and post to usenet. I
dare anyone to show me something better.
http://www.40tude.com/dialog/download.htm

Recommended update:

http://dialog.datalist.org/downloads/download.html

Also viable candidates for "better":

http://gravity.tbates.org/super.html
http://xnews.newsguy.com/
Post by 98 Guy
Much better than that POS Win-me. What an abortion that was.
I found Windows ME was better at recovering from low user resources than
Windows 98SE. Both were hampered by that limitation, though, compared with
any Windows based on the NT kernel.
--
Norman
~Oh Lord, why have you come
~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum
Hieroglyph Lumphammer
2011-08-05 15:48:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by N. Miller
Post by 98 Guy
I use Netscape Communicator 4.79 for reading news.
...
Post by 98 Guy
Very fast and efficient and organized way to read and post to
usenet. I dare anyone to show me something better.
http://www.40tude.com/dialog/download.htm
http://dialog.datalist.org/downloads/download.html
http://gravity.tbates.org/super.html
http://xnews.newsguy.com/
Post by 98 Guy
Much better than that POS Win-me. What an abortion that was.
I found Windows ME was better at recovering from low user resources
than Windows 98SE. Both were hampered by that limitation, though,
compared with any Windows based on the NT kernel.
Indeed. In fact I consider sticking with any 9x version today to be evidence
of a psychiatric condition. It makes more sense to swear by DOS.

HL
AnnonyMouse
2011-08-05 16:38:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by Hieroglyph Lumphammer
Post by N. Miller
I found Windows ME was better at recovering from low user resources
than Windows 98SE. Both were hampered by that limitation, though,
compared with any Windows based on the NT kernel.
Indeed. In fact I consider sticking with any 9x version today to be
evidence of a psychiatric condition. It makes more sense to swear by DOS.
Agreed though there has never been any doubt that 98 Idiot needs serious
psychiatric help and has done for a long time, the guy is about as clueless
as they come and clearly know less than nothing about Win Me.

AM
RockyTSquirrel
2011-08-05 23:47:58 UTC
Permalink
Everybody has a favorite system..

I still use MS-DOS 6.6 for somethings
Win-ME for somethings
and Win- 7 home for somethings..

Most of the problems I've had since 1979 have been hardware, not
software..
Having said that, I never did much swapping of software, found what worked
for me and stuck with it..

RTS
Post by Hieroglyph Lumphammer
Post by N. Miller
I found Windows ME was better at recovering from low user resources
than Windows 98SE. Both were hampered by that limitation, though,
compared with any Windows based on the NT kernel.
Indeed. In fact I consider sticking with any 9x version today to be
evidence of a psychiatric condition. It makes more sense to swear by DOS.
Agreed though there has never been any doubt that 98 Idiot needs serious
psychiatric help and has done for a long time, the guy is about as clueless
as they come and clearly know less than nothing about Win Me.

AM
Hieroglyph Lumphammer
2011-08-07 11:26:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by RockyTSquirrel
Everybody has a favorite system..
Sure. Ish.
Post by RockyTSquirrel
I still use MS-DOS 6.6 for somethings
Win-ME for somethings
and Win- 7 home for somethings..
So long as they're not an excuse for zealotry. For some people their
favourite operating system is like the one true operating system and death
to all non-believers.

But whether we bring religeon into it or not, if someone has enough of a
soft spot for Win Me such that they still use it from time to time despite
it being inferior to, say, XP in every way, the only reason to use it
predominantly would be hardware so old nothing more recent would run on it.
Personally I don't buy an explanation that someone might be so broke as to
be stuck with 20th century hardware, yet able to afford the juice to run it
and the internet connection to be a regular on usenet. It may well be
theoretically possible but I still think to actually be in that position
requires some degree of mental illness and that more likely the person
using, say, 9x predominantly or entirely, as we head towards 2012, and
shouts it from the rooftops so-to-speak (and berates others for daring to
disagree) is doing so as a religious zealot, i.e. a psychiatric condition.

When 98/Me were current such people came out with much the same stuff about
DOS (generally the MS variant, interestingly, possibly akin to how maybe 99%
of all anti-Windows Linux users who post diatribes to Windows-centric
newsgroups use Ubuntu - not even Kubuntu, let alone Slackware!). And I used
to bait them too, heh heh.
Post by RockyTSquirrel
Most of the problems I've had since 1979 have been hardware, not
software..
Having said that, I never did much swapping of software, found what
worked for me and stuck with it..
Yes. Are you sure that isn't just old age?

:)

I say that because I do that myself these last years and I'm _sure_ with me
that's why.

HL
webster72n
2011-08-09 02:00:28 UTC
Permalink
Gotcha!

Harry.
Post by RockyTSquirrel
Everybody has a favorite system..
Sure. Ish.
Post by RockyTSquirrel
I still use MS-DOS 6.6 for somethings
Win-ME for somethings
and Win- 7 home for somethings..
So long as they're not an excuse for zealotry. For some people their
favourite operating system is like the one true operating system and death
to all non-believers.

But whether we bring religeon into it or not, if someone has enough of a
soft spot for Win Me such that they still use it from time to time despite
it being inferior to, say, XP in every way, the only reason to use it
predominantly would be hardware so old nothing more recent would run on it.
Personally I don't buy an explanation that someone might be so broke as to
be stuck with 20th century hardware, yet able to afford the juice to run it
and the internet connection to be a regular on usenet. It may well be
theoretically possible but I still think to actually be in that position
requires some degree of mental illness and that more likely the person
using, say, 9x predominantly or entirely, as we head towards 2012, and
shouts it from the rooftops so-to-speak (and berates others for daring to
disagree) is doing so as a religious zealot, i.e. a psychiatric condition.

When 98/Me were current such people came out with much the same stuff about
DOS (generally the MS variant, interestingly, possibly akin to how maybe 99%
of all anti-Windows Linux users who post diatribes to Windows-centric
newsgroups use Ubuntu - not even Kubuntu, let alone Slackware!). And I used
to bait them too, heh heh.
Post by RockyTSquirrel
Most of the problems I've had since 1979 have been hardware, not
software..
Having said that, I never did much swapping of software, found what
worked for me and stuck with it..
Yes. Are you sure that isn't just old age?

:)

I say that because I do that myself these last years and I'm _sure_ with me
that's why.

HL

Loading...